A broad SEO suite with an agent that pushes on-page fixes through a script on your site. Below: what they're good at, where we differ, and how to check every word of it yourself.
We did — we sell one of the products on this page, so read it as an argument, not a review. What we can offer instead of neutrality is checkability: every claim about another product is attributed to their own public pages, dated, and comes with instructions for verifying it without us. Found something wrong or out of date? hello@citeworthy.io and we'll fix it.
Search Atlas is a full SEO platform — site auditing, rank tracking, content tooling and reporting in one subscription. If you want one vendor for the whole discipline, that is a real advantage and we do not have it.
OTTO is positioned as an AI SEO agent that generates and deploys on-page changes — metadata, schema, internal links, image alt text — at scale, which is genuinely more surface area than we cover today.
OTTO applies its changes through a script installed on the site, so fixes can go live without a developer in the loop. We agree with that architecture — ours is a Cloudflare Worker at the edge rather than a client-side script.
The platform is built for agencies running many client sites, with the reporting that implies.
Our approved fixes are merged into the HTML at the edge before it leaves Cloudflare, so a crawler that never runs JavaScript still sees them. A change delivered by a browser script depends on the client executing it.
We do not do rank tracking, backlinks or content briefs. We audit, propose, apply and measure. If you want the whole suite, they have one and we do not.
We publish a measured verdict on the changes we make — d14 and d28, per change, labelled correlation and not causation — and autonomy is earned by those verdicts rather than asserted in advance.
Our changes are served, not scripted: you point one DNS record at us and we merge approved changes into the HTML at the edge, before it leaves Cloudflare. No plugin, no script tag, no Cloudflare account of your own, no CMS deploy — and a crawler that never runs JavaScript still sees them. That also means we are a dependency of your site while the record points at us, which is a real thing to ask — so we publish exactly what we've built for our own bad days, and the fact that the exit is a DNS record you control. The operational story →
Every change we apply gets a before/after verdict at 14 and 28 days, labelled correlation rather than causation, and a fix type is only allowed to run automatically after enough settled, non-negative verdicts of that type on your site. One negative verdict pulls it back to manual approval. We could not find a published, per-change outcome verdict of this kind in the public materials of the tools on these pages — that's a statement about our search, and we'd rather be corrected than be wrong: hello@citeworthy.io.
Free, one site, no card. The fastest way to compare anything is to run both.
run a free auditThe pipeline underneath is MIT-licensed and public. The judgment layer is what we sell.
open source →